Fort Mohave vs Tucson Estates

Which is the better fit for you?

Fort Mohave, AZ
39
Area Score
Bottom 2% nationally
Tucson Estates, AZ
47
Area Score
Bottom 12% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tucson Estates receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fort Mohave to Tucson Estates

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
5% higher
Regional price level 94.9 against 90.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$85 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,280 in Tucson Estates against $1,365 in Fort Mohave.
The median home
30% less
$205,400 in Tucson Estates against $294,300 in Fort Mohave.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F colder
Normal January lows are 41°F in Tucson Estates against 46°F in Fort Mohave; July highs are 99°F against 111°F (summers 12°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Fort Mohave
Tucson Estates
Opportunity: Tucson Estates is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
16 · Bottom 1%
vs
24 · Bottom 3%
Growth: Tucson Estates is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
33 · Bottom 18%
vs
51 · Top 49%
Climate: Tucson Estates is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
51 · Bottom 1%
vs
64 · Bottom 33%
Physical resilience: Fort Mohave is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 16%
vs
19 · Bottom 13%
Housing affordability: Tucson Estates is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
64 · Bottom 43%
vs
74 · Top 26%
Schools: Tucson Estates is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
44 · Bottom 43%
vs
50 · Top 49%
Access
96 · Top 33%
vs
96 · Top 35%
Economic stability: Tucson Estates is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
48 · Bottom 32%
vs
57 · Bottom 49%

Measured values

MetricFort MohaveTucson EstatesSource period
Population15,71512,1362024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$64,815 ±$6,773$66,582 ±$8,0552024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$33,933 ±$2,727$35,496 ±$2,6792024 ACS 5-Year
Population density941/sq mi954/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$294,300$205,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,010 ±$123$1,248 ±$4742024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,365$1,280 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index90.5 — more favorable94.92023
Homeownership rate85.8%90.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate6.9%5.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−5.4%−4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher10.8%24.4% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.1%8.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)9004,79012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.14.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−63.6%+5.2% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high111°F99°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low46°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation4.3"11.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi — more favorable12 miNASR current cycle
Average commute20.1 min — more favorable33.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age60.453.92024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher19.716.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.9%45.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency49.5% — more favorable46.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fort Mohave

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Tucson Estates

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fort Mohave
—
Fort Mohave: Your Score
39
Area Score
Tucson Estates
—
Tucson Estates: Your Score
47
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fort Mohave, AZ · Tucson Estates, AZ · How this is calculated: methodology