Fort Campbell North vs Port Townsend

Which is the better fit for you?

Fort Campbell North, KY
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally
Port Townsend, WA
55
Area Score
Bottom 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Port Townsend receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fort Campbell North to Port Townsend

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Port Townsend, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$21 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,367 in Port Townsend against $1,346 in Fort Campbell North.
The weather you would swap
Winters 10°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Port Townsend against 28°F in Fort Campbell North; July highs are 69°F against 89°F (summers 20°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fort Campbell North
Port Townsend
Opportunity: Port Townsend is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
56 · Top 50%
vs
79 · Top 9%
Growth: Port Townsend is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
72 · Top 12%
vs
80 · Top 4%
Climate: Fort Campbell North is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 27%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: Fort Campbell North is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
42 · Bottom 33%
vs
31 · Bottom 24%
Housing affordability: Fort Campbell North is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
50 · Bottom 21%
vs
25 · Bottom 2%
Schools: Port Townsend is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
29 · Bottom 24%
vs
35 · Bottom 30%
Access: Port Townsend is the more favorable of the two.
Access
68 · Bottom 10%
vs
71 · Bottom 12%
Economic stability: Fort Campbell North is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
47 · Bottom 31%
vs
39 · Bottom 20%

Measured values

MetricFort Campbell NorthPort TownsendSource period
Population11,35610,4382024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$58,933 ±$6,623$62,606 ±$3,4732024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$23,839$45,197 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,331/sq mi1,504/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,529 ±$69$1,578 ±$1032024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,346 — more favorable$1,367FY2026
Homeownership rate1.5%67.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9%3.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.0%+2.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher16.9%53.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.3% ±5%13.6% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,50811512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents10.711.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.2%+71.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F69°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low28°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation47.2"19.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport58 mi47 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute12.0 min — more favorable15.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age22.260.82024 ACS 5-Year
Math proficiency43.4%44.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency44.4%65.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kentucky and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fort Campbell North

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Port Townsend

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fort Campbell North
—
Fort Campbell North: Your Score
54
Area Score
Port Townsend
—
Port Townsend: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fort Campbell North, KY · Port Townsend, WA · How this is calculated: methodology