Florham Park vs Oakland

Which is the better fit for you?

Florham Park, NJ
70
Area Score
Top 14% nationally
Oakland, NJ
69
Area Score
Top 17% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Florham Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Florham Park to Oakland

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$136 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,341 in Oakland against $2,205 in Florham Park.
The median home
25% less
$591,300 in Oakland against $791,400 in Florham Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 23°F in Oakland against 23°F in Florham Park; July highs are 85°F against 85°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Florham Park
Oakland
Opportunity: Oakland is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
80 · Top 8%
vs
83 · Top 4%
Growth: Oakland is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
53 · Top 42%
vs
57 · Top 36%
Climate
65 · Bottom 35%
vs
65 · Bottom 35%
Physical resilience: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Bottom 49%
vs
47 · Bottom 38%
Housing affordability
60 · Bottom 36%
vs
60 · Bottom 35%
Schools: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
93 · Top 1%
vs
88 · Top 4%
Access: Florham Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 25%
vs
89 · Bottom 39%
Economic stability: Oakland is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 33%
vs
80 · Top 4%

Measured values

MetricFlorham ParkOaklandSource period
Population13,56412,7682024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$158,696 ±$18,650$162,019 ±$15,3372024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$78,037 — more favorable$67,7752024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,855/sq mi1,501/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$791,400$591,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$3,109$1,383 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,205 — more favorable$2,341FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate69.8%92.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9%3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.8%+2.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher69.9% — more favorable56.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate9.3%2.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)474212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.5 — more favorable3.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−25.4%−47.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F23°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation44.9"44.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi — more favorable24 miNASR current cycle
Average commute28.2 min — more favorable31.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.940.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools452024-25 school year
Students per teacher10.69.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency70.4% — more favorable59.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency77.1%77.5% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility11.6%7.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Florham Park

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Oakland

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Florham Park
—
Florham Park: Your Score
70
Area Score
Oakland
—
Oakland: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Florham Park, NJ · Oakland, NJ · How this is calculated: methodology