Fitchburg vs Portage

Which is the better fit for you?

Fitchburg, WI
77
Area Score
Top 3% nationally
Portage, WI
61
Area Score
Top 42% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fitchburg receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fitchburg to Portage

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 95.9 against 95.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$499 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,195 in Portage against $1,694 in Fitchburg.
The median home
51% less
$204,900 in Portage against $417,200 in Fitchburg.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 10°F in Portage against 12°F in Fitchburg; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fitchburg
Portage
Opportunity: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
81 · Top 6%
vs
69 · Top 25%
Growth: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
77 · Top 7%
vs
65 · Top 22%
Climate: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
57 · Bottom 9%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
97 · Top 2%
vs
37 · Bottom 29%
Housing affordability: Portage is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
86 · Top 5%
Schools: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
59 · Top 37%
vs
52 · Top 46%
Access: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 35%
vs
87 · Bottom 32%
Economic stability: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
70 · Top 23%
vs
38 · Bottom 18%

Measured values

MetricFitchburgPortageSource period
Population32,61910,2362024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$86,516 — more favorable$64,7222024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$59,210 — more favorable$31,1182024 ACS 5-Year
Population density926/sq mi1,147/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$417,200$204,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,373$1,008 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,694$1,195 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index95.995.92023
Homeownership rate47.6%58.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.6% — more favorable3.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.1%+1.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher57.7% — more favorable19.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.8% ±3%12.8% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4326012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents13.2 — more favorable5.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−16.3%+185.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low12°F10°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.1"38.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi — more favorable29 miNASR current cycle
Average commute20.5 min — more favorable23.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.437.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1982024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.0 — more favorable13.12024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.9% — more favorable41.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.8% — more favorable42.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility29.0%38.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fitchburg

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Portage

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fitchburg
—
Fitchburg: Your Score
77
Area Score
Portage
—
Portage: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fitchburg, WI · Portage, WI · How this is calculated: methodology