Fairview Park vs Appleton

Which is the better fit for you?

Fairview Park, OH
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally
Appleton, WI
68
Area Score
Top 20% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fairview Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fairview Park to Appleton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% higher
Regional price level 93.7 against 92.9 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$74 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,236 in Appleton against $1,162 in Fairview Park.
The median home
3% less
$231,400 in Appleton against $239,100 in Fairview Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F colder
Normal January lows are 11°F in Appleton against 22°F in Fairview Park; July highs are 81°F against 84°F (summers 3°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

29 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Fairview Park
Appleton
Opportunity: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
70 · Top 24%
vs
72 · Top 21%
Growth: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 7%
vs
24 · Bottom 9%
Climate: Fairview Park is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
68 · Bottom 43%
vs
57 · Bottom 8%
Physical resilience: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
97 · Top 2%
vs
98 · Top 1%
Housing affordability: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 16%
vs
83 · Top 8%
Schools: Fairview Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
59 · Top 39%
vs
50 · Top 50%
Access: Fairview Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Fairview Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
70 · Top 25%
vs
68 · Top 28%

Measured values

MetricFairview ParkAppletonSource period
Population17,01875,0232024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$78,865 ±$4,628$80,483 ±$3,3172024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$46,965 ±$2,971$50,397 ±$8,7372024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,629/sq mi2,951/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$239,100$231,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,039 ±$82$1,030 ±$382024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,162 — more favorable$1,236FY2025
Cost of living index92.9 — more favorable93.72023
Homeownership rate69.7%67.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3% — more favorable3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.2%+1.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.6% — more favorable38.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate9.1% ±4%8.2% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)05412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−100.0%−47.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low22°F11°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation41.0"31.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport2 mi — more favorable7 miNASR current cycle
Average commute24.2 min20.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.437.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools4402024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.014.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency63.3%41.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.2%41.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility24.9%37.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Ohio and Wisconsin do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fairview Park
—
Fairview Park: Your Score
69
Area Score
Appleton
—
Appleton: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fairview Park, OH · Appleton, WI · How this is calculated: methodology