Fairfield vs Rio Vista

Which is the better fit for you?

Fairfield, CA
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally
Rio Vista, CA
45
Area Score
Bottom 8% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rio Vista receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Fairfield to Rio Vista

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 109.4 against 109.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$598 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,580 in Rio Vista against $2,178 in Fairfield.
The median home
22% less
$489,700 in Rio Vista against $624,300 in Fairfield.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 38°F in Rio Vista against 38°F in Fairfield; July highs are 95°F against 95°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Fairfield
Rio Vista
Opportunity: Fairfield is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 19%
vs
40 · Bottom 18%
Growth: Rio Vista is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
34 · Bottom 21%
vs
45 · Bottom 38%
Climate
77 · Top 25%
vs
77 · Top 25%
Physical resilience: Rio Vista is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
23 · Bottom 17%
vs
30 · Bottom 24%
Housing affordability: Rio Vista is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
32 · Bottom 4%
vs
55 · Bottom 28%
Schools: Fairfield is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
33 · Bottom 29%
vs
10 · Bottom 3%
Access: Rio Vista is the more favorable of the two.
Access
81 · Bottom 23%
vs
85 · Bottom 29%
Economic stability: Fairfield is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
55 · Bottom 45%
vs
54 · Bottom 43%

Measured values

MetricFairfieldRio VistaSource period
Population120,78510,1022024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$101,895 — more favorable$89,3062024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$43,473$51,183 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,904/sq mi1,531/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$624,300$489,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,266$1,724 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,178$1,580 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index109.4109.42023
Homeownership rate61.3%83.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.3%5.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1%−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate26.6% ±1%31.5% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.2% ±1%10.6% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1573312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.33.3 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−47.8%−21.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high95°F95°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation24.8"24.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport38 mi32 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute33.0 min — more favorable41.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.963.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3332024-25 school year
Students per teacher24.219.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency35.7% — more favorable23.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency50.7% — more favorable37.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility60.6%75.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Fairfield

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake, inland flooding.

Rio Vista

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Fairfield
—
Fairfield: Your Score
42
Area Score
Rio Vista
—
Rio Vista: Your Score
45
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Fairfield, CA · Rio Vista, CA · How this is calculated: methodology