Davenport vs Fitchburg

Which is the better fit for you?

Davenport, IA
57
Area Score
Bottom 43% nationally
Fitchburg, MA
55
Area Score
Bottom 36% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Davenport receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Davenport to Fitchburg

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
15% higher
Regional price level 103.0 against 89.2 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
102% more
$336,400 in Fitchburg against $166,400 in Davenport.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 16°F in Fitchburg against 14°F in Davenport; July highs are 83°F against 84°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Davenport
Fitchburg
Opportunity: Davenport is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
55 · Bottom 46%
vs
43 · Bottom 23%
Growth: Davenport is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
35 · Bottom 21%
vs
28 · Bottom 12%
Climate: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
59 · Bottom 12%
vs
60 · Bottom 14%
Physical resilience: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
79 · Top 26%
vs
85 · Top 16%
Housing affordability: Davenport is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
69 · Top 44%
Schools: Fitchburg is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
23 · Bottom 17%
vs
33 · Bottom 28%
Access: Davenport is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
87 · Bottom 32%
Economic stability: Davenport is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
48 · Bottom 32%

Measured values

MetricDavenportFitchburgSource period
Population100,91341,7982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$66,200$73,040 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$37,521 ±$1,197$37,302 ±$2,8492024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,572/sq mi1,502/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$166,400$336,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$978 — more favorable$1,2222024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index89.2 — more favorable103.02023
Homeownership rate62.9%54.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.6% — more favorable5.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.3% — more favorable−1.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher29.9% — more favorable25.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.8% ±1%15.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1131212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.1 — more favorable0.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−57.2%−58.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low14°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation36.2"43.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi — more favorable30 miNASR current cycle
Average commute20.7 min — more favorable28.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.536.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools23102024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.912.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.9%37.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.1%43.2%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Iowa and Massachusetts do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Davenport

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Fitchburg

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Davenport
—
Davenport: Your Score
57
Area Score
Fitchburg
—
Fitchburg: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Davenport, IA · Fitchburg, MA · How this is calculated: methodology