Cuyahoga Falls vs Appleton

Which is the better fit for you?

Cuyahoga Falls, OH
66
Area Score
Top 25% nationally
Appleton, WI
68
Area Score
Top 20% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Appleton receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cuyahoga Falls to Appleton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% higher
Regional price level 93.7 against 92.9 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$112 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,236 in Appleton against $1,348 in Cuyahoga Falls.
The median home
26% more
$231,400 in Appleton against $183,300 in Cuyahoga Falls.
The weather you would swap
Winters 10°F colder
Normal January lows are 11°F in Appleton against 21°F in Cuyahoga Falls; July highs are 81°F against 85°F (summers 4°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

31 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Cuyahoga Falls
Appleton
Opportunity: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
70 · Top 24%
vs
72 · Top 21%
Growth: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 8%
vs
24 · Bottom 9%
Climate: Cuyahoga Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
64 · Bottom 31%
vs
57 · Bottom 8%
Physical resilience: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
90 · Top 11%
vs
98 · Top 1%
Housing affordability: Cuyahoga Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
84 · Top 7%
vs
83 · Top 8%
Schools: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 49%
vs
50 · Top 50%
Access: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 46%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Appleton is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
61 · Top 45%
vs
68 · Top 28%

Measured values

MetricCuyahoga FallsAppletonSource period
Population50,90975,0232024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$72,705$80,483 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$43,797 ±$2,910$50,397 ±$8,7372024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,974/sq mi2,951/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$183,300$231,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,038 ±$36$1,030 ±$382024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,348$1,236 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index92.9 — more favorable93.72023
Homeownership rate64.4%67.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2% — more favorable3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)0.0%+1.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate37.7% ±2%38.2% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.2% ±2%8.2% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4395412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.8 — more favorable0.712 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−52.1%−47.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low21°F11°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation32.5"31.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute23.4 min20.5 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.437.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools9402024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.814.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency59.7%41.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency64.1%41.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility61.8%37.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Ohio and Wisconsin do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cuyahoga Falls

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Appleton

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cuyahoga Falls
—
Cuyahoga Falls: Your Score
66
Area Score
Appleton
—
Appleton: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cuyahoga Falls, OH · Appleton, WI · How this is calculated: methodology