Chippewa Falls vs Menomonie

Which is the better fit for you?

Chippewa Falls, WI
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally
Menomonie, WI
64
Area Score
Top 32% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Chippewa Falls receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chippewa Falls to Menomonie

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Menomonie, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$157 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,024 in Menomonie against $1,181 in Chippewa Falls.
The median home
5% more
$220,800 in Menomonie against $210,400 in Chippewa Falls.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 6°F in Menomonie against 6°F in Chippewa Falls; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chippewa Falls
Menomonie
Opportunity: Menomonie is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 29%
vs
78 · Top 12%
Growth: Menomonie is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
44 · Bottom 35%
vs
46 · Bottom 40%
Climate
53 · Bottom 2%
vs
53 · Bottom 2%
Physical resilience: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 21%
vs
72 · Top 34%
Housing affordability: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 12%
vs
79 · Top 14%
Schools: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 49%
vs
39 · Bottom 36%
Access: Chippewa Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
91 · Bottom 46%
Economic stability: Menomonie is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
49 · Bottom 35%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricChippewa FallsMenomonieSource period
Population14,78216,5392024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$57,873 ±$6,743$56,889 ±$5,4392024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$31,256 ±$2,301$32,639 ±$3,0492024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,300/sq mi1,201/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$210,400$220,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$910 ±$51$970 ±$562024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,181$1,024 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate50.7%40.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2%3.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.9%+2.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher20.9%38.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.4% ±5%11.6% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)541912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.7 — more favorable1.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−61.4%−20.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low6°F6°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.0"33.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi — more favorable21 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate18.8 min ±2.2 min18.8 min ±1.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.226.12024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.0 — more favorable14.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.8% — more favorable39.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.4% — more favorable37.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chippewa Falls

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Menomonie

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chippewa Falls
—
Chippewa Falls: Your Score
65
Area Score
Menomonie
—
Menomonie: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chippewa Falls, WI · Menomonie, WI · How this is calculated: methodology