Chelsea vs Vestavia Hills

Which is the better fit for you?

Chelsea, AL
71
Area Score
Top 12% nationally
Vestavia Hills, AL
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Chelsea receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Chelsea to Vestavia Hills

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 91.8 against 91.8 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$146 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,654 in Vestavia Hills against $1,800 in Chelsea.
The median home
47% more
$530,000 in Vestavia Hills against $360,000 in Chelsea.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 35°F in Vestavia Hills against 36°F in Chelsea; July highs are 91°F against 91°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Chelsea
Vestavia Hills
Opportunity: Vestavia Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
70 · Top 24%
vs
71 · Top 22%
Growth: Chelsea is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
65 · Top 21%
vs
18 · Bottom 4%
Climate
74 · Top 33%
vs
74 · Top 32%
Physical resilience: Vestavia Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
48 · Bottom 40%
vs
59 · Top 49%
Housing affordability: Chelsea is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
98 · Top 1%
vs
63 · Bottom 43%
Schools: Vestavia Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
69 · Top 26%
vs
90 · Top 3%
Access: Vestavia Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 46%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Chelsea is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 9%
vs
51 · Bottom 37%

Measured values

MetricChelseaVestavia HillsSource period
Population16,26038,6162024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$115,337$134,369 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$49,712$68,012 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density498/sq mi1,928/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$360,000$530,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,414 ±$318$1,515 ±$1302024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,800$1,654 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index91.891.82023
Homeownership rate90.0%78.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.9%2.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.9%−1.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.5%65.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate2.8% — more favorable9.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1554012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents9.5 — more favorable1.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.9%−63.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.2"56.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute34.8 min21.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.641.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools482024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.015.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency60.5%81.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.5%78.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility27.4%12.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Chelsea

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, inland flooding, earthquake.

Vestavia Hills

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Chelsea
—
Chelsea: Your Score
71
Area Score
Vestavia Hills
—
Vestavia Hills: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Chelsea, AL · Vestavia Hills, AL · How this is calculated: methodology