Charlotte vs Matthews

Which is the better fit for you?

Charlotte, NC
59
Area Score
Top 48% nationally
Matthews, NC
66
Area Score
Top 27% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Matthews receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Charlotte to Matthews

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 97.3 against 97.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$7 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,040 in Matthews against $2,033 in Charlotte.
The median home
15% more
$445,100 in Matthews against $385,700 in Charlotte.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 32°F in Matthews against 32°F in Charlotte; July highs are 91°F against 90°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Charlotte
Matthews
Opportunity: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
58 · Top 47%
vs
66 · Top 30%
Growth
46 · Bottom 41%
vs
46 · Bottom 42%
Climate: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 39%
vs
76 · Top 26%
Physical resilience
50 · Bottom 44%
vs
50 · Bottom 43%
Housing affordability: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
68 · Top 46%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
49 · Bottom 49%
vs
73 · Top 20%
Access: Charlotte is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
95 · Top 39%
Economic stability: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Bottom 49%
vs
75 · Top 12%

Measured values

MetricCharlotteMatthewsSource period
Population903,84430,5772024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$82,068$108,611 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$51,814 ±$879$53,265 ±$3,4532024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,901/sq mi1,787/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$385,700$445,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,612 — more favorable$1,7642024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,033 — more favorable$2,040FY2026
Cost of living index97.397.32023
Homeownership rate51.0%64.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8%3.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.0%55.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate11.1%3.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5,0255,02512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.44.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−51.3%−51.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low32°F32°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation43.6"37.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate26.4 min ±0.3 min26.9 min ±1.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.540.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools17692024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.8 — more favorable18.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency47.2%64.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency44.3%57.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility74.2%53.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Charlotte

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Matthews

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Charlotte
—
Charlotte: Your Score
59
Area Score
Matthews
—
Matthews: Your Score
66
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Charlotte, NC · Matthews, NC · How this is calculated: methodology