Camden vs Woodward

Which is the better fit for you?

Camden, AR
41
Area Score
Bottom 4% nationally
Woodward, OK
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Woodward receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Camden to Woodward

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Camden or Woodward, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$181 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,061 in Woodward against $880 in Camden.
The median home
47% more
$157,800 in Woodward against $107,400 in Camden.
The weather you would swap
Winters 12°F colder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Woodward against 34°F in Camden; July highs are 95°F against 94°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Camden
Woodward
Opportunity: Woodward is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
36 · Bottom 12%
vs
37 · Bottom 13%
Growth: Woodward is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
13 · Bottom 2%
vs
21 · Bottom 6%
Climate: Camden is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
70 · Bottom 47%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience: Camden is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
29 · Bottom 23%
vs
27 · Bottom 21%
Housing affordability: Woodward is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 31%
vs
90 · Top 2%
Schools: Camden is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
31 · Bottom 26%
vs
28 · Bottom 23%
Access: Woodward is the more favorable of the two.
Access
45 · Bottom 2%
vs
53 · Bottom 4%
Economic stability: Woodward is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
24 · Bottom 5%
vs
38 · Bottom 19%

Measured values

MetricCamdenWoodwardSource period
Population10,30711,8822024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$49,361 ±$3,736$54,463 ±$5,2622024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$28,226$34,644 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density624/sq mi906/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$107,400$157,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$768 ±$145$839 ±$632024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$880 — more favorable$1,061FY2026
Homeownership rate59.1%64.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1%4.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8% — more favorable−1.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate18.5% ±4%18.6% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate20.6% ±4%16.2% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.3 — more favorable0.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−70.0%−33.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F95°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low34°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation52.1"21.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport88 mi76 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate22.6 min ±2.5 min20.6 min ±3.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.235.22024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher9.9 — more favorable16.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.3%30.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency36.6%33.0%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Arkansas and Oklahoma do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Camden

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, strong wind.

Woodward

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, wildfire, drought.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Camden
—
Camden: Your Score
41
Area Score
Woodward
—
Woodward: Your Score
42
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Camden, AR · Woodward, OK · How this is calculated: methodology