Cambridge vs Tremonton

Which is the better fit for you?

Cambridge, MN
53
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally
Tremonton, UT
58
Area Score
Bottom 48% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tremonton receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Cambridge to Tremonton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Tremonton, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$591 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,118 in Tremonton against $1,709 in Cambridge.
The median home
45% more
$364,900 in Tremonton against $251,600 in Cambridge.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F milder
Normal January lows are 15°F in Tremonton against 4°F in Cambridge; July highs are 91°F against 82°F (summers 9°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Cambridge
Tremonton
Opportunity: Tremonton is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
29 · Bottom 5%
vs
44 · Bottom 24%
Growth: Cambridge is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
79 · Top 5%
vs
74 · Top 10%
Climate: Tremonton is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
51 · Bottom 1%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience: Cambridge is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
62 · Top 45%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Housing affordability: Tremonton is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
62 · Bottom 39%
vs
73 · Top 31%
Schools: Tremonton is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
36 · Bottom 32%
vs
42 · Bottom 40%
Access: Tremonton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
71 · Bottom 12%
vs
97 · Top 24%
Economic stability: Cambridge is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
62 · Top 42%
vs
59 · Top 47%

Measured values

MetricCambridgeTremontonSource period
Population10,30711,4772024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$69,154 ±$5,981$74,741 ±$4,4232024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$35,047 ±$2,488$32,336 ±$3,7292024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,378/sq mi1,379/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$251,600$364,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,302 ±$83$1,220 ±$1362024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,709$1,118 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate65.8%65.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.5%3.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.1% — more favorable−4.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate18.8% ±3%16.3% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.5% ±3%10.7% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)24113112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents23.4 — more favorable11.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+391.8%+40.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low4°F15°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.7"15.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport47 mi13 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute31.1 min23.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.629.42024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.3 — more favorable21.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency47.3%44.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency62.3%48.5%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Minnesota and Utah do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Cambridge

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind.

Tremonton

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Cambridge
—
Cambridge: Your Score
53
Area Score
Tremonton
—
Tremonton: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Cambridge, MN · Tremonton, UT · How this is calculated: methodology