Burkburnett vs Wichita Falls

Which is the better fit for you?

Burkburnett, TX
52
Area Score
Bottom 27% nationally
Wichita Falls, TX
50
Area Score
Bottom 19% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Burkburnett receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Burkburnett to Wichita Falls

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 89.5 against 89.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,136 in Wichita Falls against $1,136 in Burkburnett.
The median home
3% more
$156,800 in Wichita Falls against $151,900 in Burkburnett.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 30°F in Wichita Falls against 30°F in Burkburnett; July highs are 97°F against 97°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Burkburnett
Wichita Falls
Opportunity: Burkburnett is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 19%
vs
38 · Bottom 15%
Growth: Burkburnett is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
42 · Bottom 31%
vs
23 · Bottom 7%
Climate
55 · Bottom 6%
vs
55 · Bottom 6%
Physical resilience: Burkburnett is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
67 · Top 40%
vs
66 · Top 41%
Housing affordability: Wichita Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 30%
vs
77 · Top 19%
Schools: Burkburnett is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
28 · Bottom 23%
vs
27 · Bottom 22%
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Wichita Falls is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
32 · Bottom 12%
vs
33 · Bottom 12%

Measured values

MetricBurkburnettWichita FallsSource period
Population11,059102,5812024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$66,308 — more favorable$60,1772024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$35,053 ±$3,654$33,078 ±$1,3312024 ACS 5-Year
Population density973/sq mi1,421/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$151,900$156,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$964 — more favorable$1,0222024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,136$1,136FY2026
Cost of living index89.589.52023
Homeownership rate69.0%56.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.6% — more favorable4.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate22.8% ±4%25.4% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate16.5% ±6%16.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)165612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.4 — more favorable0.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−20.0%−24.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high97°F97°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low30°F30°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation27.9"27.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi6 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute18.7 min15.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.933.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools5312024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.7 — more favorable14.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.8%41.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency37.8%38.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility51.3%69.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Burkburnett

Elevated or high exposure: drought, wildfire.

Wichita Falls

Elevated or high exposure: drought, wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Burkburnett
—
Burkburnett: Your Score
52
Area Score
Wichita Falls
—
Wichita Falls: Your Score
50
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Burkburnett, TX · Wichita Falls, TX · How this is calculated: methodology