Brockton vs St. Paul

Which is the better fit for you?

Brockton, MA
51
Area Score
Bottom 25% nationally
St. Paul, MN
56
Area Score
Bottom 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

St. Paul receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Brockton to St. Paul

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
6% lower
Regional price level 104.3 against 110.4 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
33% less
$294,500 in St. Paul against $437,500 in Brockton.
The weather you would swap
Winters 10°F colder
Normal January lows are 9°F in St. Paul against 19°F in Brockton; July highs are 83°F against 82°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Brockton
St. Paul
Opportunity: St. Paul is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 13%
vs
43 · Bottom 23%
Growth: St. Paul is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
32 · Bottom 17%
vs
34 · Bottom 21%
Climate: Brockton is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 24%
vs
55 · Bottom 5%
Physical resilience: St. Paul is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
89 · Top 13%
vs
93 · Top 7%
Housing affordability: St. Paul is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
58 · Bottom 33%
vs
73 · Top 32%
Schools: St. Paul is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
12 · Bottom 4%
vs
18 · Bottom 10%
Access: St. Paul is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 46%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Brockton is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
53 · Bottom 42%
vs
51 · Bottom 37%

Measured values

MetricBrocktonSt. PaulSource period
Population105,386307,2842024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$80,115 — more favorable$73,3942024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$35,830$42,815 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,940/sq mi5,912/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$437,500$294,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,641$1,281 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index110.4104.3 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate57.4%52.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate6.1%4.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8% — more favorable−2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher22.3%43.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.6% ±2%14.7% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4143712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.41.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.9%+46.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F9°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation53.3"29.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute34.1 min22.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.733.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools241412024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.715.1 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency24.1%37.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency28.6%44.9%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise. This is common on these pages by construction: Brockton and St. Paul were paired because they are alike, and the more alike two places are, the less a sample of this size can tell them apart.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Massachusetts and Minnesota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Brockton

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, hurricane.

St. Paul

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Brockton
—
Brockton: Your Score
51
Area Score
St. Paul
—
St. Paul: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Brockton, MA · St. Paul, MN · How this is calculated: methodology