Bell vs Cudahy

Which is the better fit for you?

Bell, CA
36
Area Score
Bottom 1% nationally
Cudahy, CA
36
Area Score
Bottom 1% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Bell and Cudahy receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bell to Cudahy

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 114.7 against 114.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,427 in Cudahy against $2,427 in Bell.
The median home
16% less
$494,100 in Cudahy against $591,600 in Bell.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 49°F in Cudahy against 49°F in Bell; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Bell
Cudahy
Opportunity
21 · Bottom 2%
vs
21 · Bottom 2%
Growth
8 · Bottom 1%
vs
8 · Bottom 1%
Climate
100 · Top 4%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Physical resilience
11 · Bottom 4%
vs
11 · Bottom 4%
Housing affordability: Cudahy is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
26 · Bottom 2%
vs
29 · Bottom 3%
Schools
41 · Bottom 38%
vs
41 · Bottom 38%
Access: Cudahy is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 10%
vs
100 · Top 3%
Economic stability: Bell is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
40 · Bottom 21%
vs
34 · Bottom 14%

Measured values

MetricBellCudahySource period
Population32,47622,0872024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$61,020 ±$4,687$56,615 ±$5,1142024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$23,027 — more favorable$18,9682024 ACS 5-Year
Population density12,949/sq mi18,781/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$591,600$494,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,575 — more favorable$1,7112024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,427$2,427FY2026
Cost of living index114.7114.72023
Homeownership rate26.5%14.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.9%5.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher9.7% — more favorable6.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate21.8% — more favorable30.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.20.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−50.0%−58.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low49°F49°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation14.3"14.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi10 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate33.3 min ±1.3 min34.3 min ±1.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.330.72024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher21.521.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency39.6%39.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency52.9%52.9%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Bell

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Cudahy

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bell
—
Bell: Your Score
36
Area Score
Cudahy
—
Cudahy: Your Score
36
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bell, CA · Cudahy, CA · How this is calculated: methodology