Beaverton vs Gresham

Which is the better fit for you?

Beaverton, OR
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally
Gresham, OR
47
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Beaverton receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Beaverton to Gresham

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 106.7 against 106.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,922 in Gresham against $1,922 in Beaverton.
The median home
19% less
$458,700 in Gresham against $569,800 in Beaverton.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 37°F in Gresham against 34°F in Beaverton; July highs are 82°F against 82°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Beaverton
Gresham
Opportunity: Beaverton is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
52 · Bottom 40%
vs
40 · Bottom 17%
Growth: Beaverton is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
75 · Top 9%
vs
27 · Bottom 12%
Climate: Gresham is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
73 · Top 38%
vs
78 · Top 22%
Physical resilience: Gresham is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
54 · Bottom 46%
vs
61 · Top 47%
Housing affordability: Beaverton is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
60 · Bottom 36%
vs
47 · Bottom 18%
Schools: Beaverton is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
73 · Top 20%
vs
15 · Bottom 7%
Access: Beaverton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 50%
vs
90 · Bottom 42%
Economic stability: Beaverton is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
64 · Top 38%
vs
52 · Bottom 39%

Measured values

MetricBeavertonGreshamSource period
Population97,812112,3782024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$98,622 — more favorable$77,7952024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$52,507 — more favorable$36,7862024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,956/sq mi4,769/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$569,800$458,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,826$1,586 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,922$1,922FY2026
Cost of living index106.7106.72023
Homeownership rate50.5%55.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.1% — more favorable5.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.8%−0.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher50.1% — more favorable23.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.1% ±2%12.2% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,12721212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents11.5 — more favorable1.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+303.9%−38.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low34°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation35.9"40.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi10 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.0 min — more favorable27.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.837.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools41222024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.4 — more favorable21.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.8% — more favorable29.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency63.7% — more favorable50.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility55.3%84.8%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Beaverton

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Gresham

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Beaverton
—
Beaverton: Your Score
64
Area Score
Gresham
—
Gresham: Your Score
47
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Beaverton, OR · Gresham, OR · How this is calculated: methodology