Bakersfield vs McFarland

Which is the better fit for you?

Bakersfield, CA
47
Area Score
Bottom 12% nationally
McFarland, CA
40
Area Score
Bottom 3% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Bakersfield receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Bakersfield to McFarland

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.4 against 102.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,483 in McFarland against $1,483 in Bakersfield.
The median home
27% less
$272,700 in McFarland against $371,700 in Bakersfield.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 41°F in McFarland against 41°F in Bakersfield; July highs are 98°F against 98°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Bakersfield
McFarland
Opportunity: Bakersfield is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 20%
vs
26 · Bottom 4%
Growth: McFarland is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
66 · Top 20%
vs
77 · Top 7%
Climate
69 · Bottom 44%
vs
69 · Bottom 44%
Physical resilience
15 · Bottom 10%
vs
15 · Bottom 10%
Housing affordability: Bakersfield is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
59 · Bottom 33%
vs
48 · Bottom 18%
Schools: Bakersfield is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
23 · Bottom 16%
vs
6 · Bottom 1%
Access: Bakersfield is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
93 · Top 46%
Economic stability: Bakersfield is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
44 · Bottom 27%
vs
34 · Bottom 14%

Measured values

MetricBakersfieldMcFarlandSource period
Population411,98614,2222024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$80,540 — more favorable$54,6082024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$33,405 — more favorable$17,4922024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,742/sq mi2,243/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$371,700$272,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,472$1,131 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,483$1,483FY2026
Cost of living index102.4102.42023
Homeownership rate60.6%56.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate6.9% — more favorable8.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1%−1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher23.6% — more favorable6.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate16.3% — more favorable23.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,75010612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.27.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+9.9%+307.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high98°F98°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation6.4"6.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable19 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate24.6 min ±0.5 min26.3 min ±3.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age32.126.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools12872024-25 school year
Students per teacher22.6 — more favorable24.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency30.3% — more favorable24.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency48.3% — more favorable33.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility79.2%85.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Bakersfield

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, heat wave, earthquake.

McFarland

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, heat wave, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Bakersfield
—
Bakersfield: Your Score
47
Area Score
McFarland
—
McFarland: Your Score
40
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Bakersfield, CA · McFarland, CA · How this is calculated: methodology