Auburn vs Tacoma

Which is the better fit for you?

Auburn, WA
47
Area Score
Bottom 13% nationally
Tacoma, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Tacoma receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Auburn to Tacoma

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$223 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,420 in Tacoma against $2,197 in Auburn.
The median home
12% less
$479,600 in Tacoma against $547,900 in Auburn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Tacoma against 38°F in Auburn; July highs are 76°F against 77°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Auburn
Tacoma
Opportunity: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 19%
vs
47 · Bottom 32%
Growth: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
40 · Bottom 29%
vs
72 · Top 12%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
41 · Bottom 31%
vs
32 · Bottom 26%
Housing affordability: Tacoma is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
50 · Bottom 20%
vs
53 · Bottom 25%
Schools: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
24 · Bottom 17%
vs
18 · Bottom 9%
Access: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Access
94 · Top 45%
vs
91 · Bottom 46%
Economic stability: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
62 · Top 41%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricAuburnTacomaSource period
Population85,676222,7582024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$97,884 — more favorable$85,8842024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$42,587$45,650 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,897/sq mi4,480/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$547,900$479,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,786$1,676 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,197 — more favorable$2,420FY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate60.6%55.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.2% — more favorable5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.3%−1.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher25.6%34.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate8.6% — more favorable12.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)491,26712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.65.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+44.8%+155.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high77°F76°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.3"42.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute32.9 min30.6 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.037.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools33622024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.8 — more favorable18.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency41.0% — more favorable38.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency56.7% — more favorable55.3%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility63.1%56.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Auburn

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Tacoma

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Auburn
—
Auburn: Your Score
47
Area Score
Tacoma
—
Tacoma: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Auburn, WA · Tacoma, WA · How this is calculated: methodology