Auburn vs Sacramento

Which is the better fit for you?

Auburn, CA
53
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally
Sacramento, CA
55
Area Score
Bottom 37% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Sacramento receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Auburn to Sacramento

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 109.1 against 109.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$305 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,215 in Sacramento against $1,910 in Auburn.
The median home
25% less
$506,300 in Sacramento against $672,500 in Auburn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 41°F in Sacramento against 38°F in Auburn; July highs are 94°F against 93°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Auburn
Sacramento
Opportunity: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
54 · Bottom 44%
vs
43 · Bottom 22%
Growth: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
50 · Bottom 49%
vs
61 · Top 27%
Climate: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
76 · Top 27%
vs
81 · Top 16%
Physical resilience: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
44 · Bottom 34%
vs
63 · Top 45%
Housing affordability: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
33 · Bottom 5%
vs
52 · Bottom 23%
Schools: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
48 · Bottom 48%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Access: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 45%
vs
100 · Top 4%
Economic stability: Sacramento is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
46 · Bottom 29%
vs
50 · Bottom 35%

Measured values

MetricAuburnSacramentoSource period
Population13,768528,7062024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$82,674 ±$8,466$87,321 ±$1,7462024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$53,951 — more favorable$43,3762024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,918/sq mi5,360/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$672,500$506,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,501 — more favorable$1,7792024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,910 — more favorable$2,215FY2026
Cost of living index109.1109.12023
Homeownership rate62.4%51.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4% — more favorable5.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2%−2.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate40.6% ±4%37.1% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.5% ±4%13.5% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)172,39712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.24.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+70.0%+24.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation36.1"19.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport23 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute23.4 min — more favorable26.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age47.536.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools71402024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.2 — more favorable22.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency40.6% — more favorable31.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.3% — more favorable44.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility45.5%72.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Auburn

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake.

Sacramento

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Auburn
—
Auburn: Your Score
53
Area Score
Sacramento
—
Sacramento: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Auburn, CA · Sacramento, CA · How this is calculated: methodology