Auburn vs Oxford

Which is the better fit for you?

Auburn, AL
71
Area Score
Top 11% nationally
Oxford, MS
77
Area Score
Top 2% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Oxford receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Auburn to Oxford

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Oxford, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$62 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,243 in Oxford against $1,181 in Auburn.
The median home
6% more
$385,700 in Oxford against $364,800 in Auburn.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F colder
Normal January lows are 31°F in Oxford against 35°F in Auburn; July highs are 91°F against 89°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Auburn
Oxford
Opportunity: Oxford is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
71 · Top 22%
vs
87 · Top 1%
Growth
78 · Top 6%
vs
78 · Top 6%
Climate: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
84 · Top 10%
vs
70 · Top 50%
Physical resilience: Oxford is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
70 · Top 36%
vs
88 · Top 13%
Housing affordability: Oxford is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
53 · Bottom 25%
vs
67 · Top 50%
Schools: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
80 · Top 12%
vs
78 · Top 14%
Access: Oxford is the more favorable of the two.
Access
69 · Bottom 10%
vs
72 · Bottom 13%
Economic stability: Auburn is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
48 · Bottom 33%
vs
39 · Bottom 21%

Measured values

MetricAuburnOxfordSource period
Population80,59426,4112024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$63,668 ±$4,618$64,451 ±$5,2652024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$37,018 ±$1,726$41,665 ±$4,7892024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,280/sq mi992/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$364,800$385,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,098 ±$35$1,071 ±$652024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,181 — more favorable$1,243FY2026
Homeownership rate53.1%43.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%2.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.2%+6.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher64.1% — more favorable57.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.1% ±3%13.1% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,04029512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents12.9 — more favorable11.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+8.3%+9.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low35°F31°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.5"60.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport57 mi52 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate21.3 min ±0.9 min23.1 min ±2.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age25.930.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools14122024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.013.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency72.8%65.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency63.9%55.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility33.5%48.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Alabama and Mississippi do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Auburn

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Oxford

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Auburn
—
Auburn: Your Score
71
Area Score
Oxford
—
Oxford: Your Score
77
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Auburn, AL · Oxford, MS · How this is calculated: methodology