Allison Park vs Pittsburgh

Which is the better fit for you?

Allison Park, PA
80
Area Score
Top 1% nationally
Pittsburgh, PA
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Allison Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Allison Park to Pittsburgh

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 94.7 against 94.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$18 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,562 in Pittsburgh against $1,580 in Allison Park.
The median home
41% less
$205,800 in Pittsburgh against $346,900 in Allison Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Pittsburgh against 21°F in Allison Park; July highs are 83°F against 83°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Allison Park
Pittsburgh
Opportunity: Allison Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
84 · Top 4%
vs
75 · Top 16%
Growth: Pittsburgh is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
67 · Top 19%
vs
77 · Top 7%
Climate: Pittsburgh is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
64 · Bottom 32%
vs
65 · Bottom 34%
Physical resilience
81 · Top 21%
vs
81 · Top 21%
Housing affordability: Allison Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
84 · Top 7%
vs
74 · Top 28%
Schools: Allison Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
94 · Top 1%
vs
36 · Bottom 33%
Access: Pittsburgh is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 40%
vs
96 · Top 36%
Economic stability: Allison Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
78 · Top 7%
vs
39 · Bottom 21%

Measured values

MetricAllison ParkPittsburghSource period
Population22,045304,7592024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$113,822 — more favorable$65,7422024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$60,266 — more favorable$45,3852024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,590/sq mi5,504/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$346,900$205,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,222 ±$99$1,261 ±$272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,580$1,562 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index94.794.72023
Homeownership rate77.2%47.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.6% — more favorable3.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.1%+2.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher61.8% — more favorable49.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate2.9% — more favorable16.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3,5782,43012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.98.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+43.7%+103.2% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low21°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.6"41.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi14 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.7 min24.6 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.233.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools7762024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.612.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency81.4% — more favorable36.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency88.3% — more favorable52.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility17.6%83.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Allison Park
—
Allison Park: Your Score
80
Area Score
Pittsburgh
—
Pittsburgh: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Allison Park, PA · Pittsburgh, PA · How this is calculated: methodology