Alabaster vs Matthews

Which is the better fit for you?

Alabaster, AL
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally
Matthews, NC
66
Area Score
Top 27% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Matthews receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Alabaster to Matthews

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
6% higher
Regional price level 97.3 against 91.8 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$730 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,040 in Matthews against $1,310 in Alabaster.
The median home
70% more
$445,100 in Matthews against $261,700 in Alabaster.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F colder
Normal January lows are 32°F in Matthews against 36°F in Alabaster; July highs are 91°F against 91°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Alabaster
Matthews
Opportunity: Alabaster is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 29%
vs
66 · Top 30%
Growth: Alabaster is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
54 · Top 40%
vs
46 · Bottom 42%
Climate: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
74 · Top 33%
vs
76 · Top 26%
Physical resilience: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
48 · Bottom 40%
vs
50 · Bottom 43%
Housing affordability: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 44%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
66 · Top 29%
vs
73 · Top 20%
Access: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Access
88 · Bottom 34%
vs
95 · Top 39%
Economic stability: Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
69 · Top 26%
vs
75 · Top 12%

Measured values

MetricAlabasterMatthewsSource period
Population33,91730,5772024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$91,357$108,611 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$40,642$53,265 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,292/sq mi1,787/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$261,700$445,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,372 — more favorable$1,7642024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,310 — more favorable$2,040FY2026
Cost of living index91.8 — more favorable97.32023
Homeownership rate87.1%64.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.9% — more favorable3.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.9%−1.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher41.1%55.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate7.1%3.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)875,02512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.64.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−4.4%−51.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F32°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.2"37.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport24 mi15 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute32.3 min26.9 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.640.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools692024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.2 — more favorable18.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency60.8%64.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency51.9%57.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility51.9%53.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Alabama and North Carolina do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Alabaster

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, inland flooding, earthquake.

Matthews

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Alabaster
—
Alabaster: Your Score
64
Area Score
Matthews
—
Matthews: Your Score
66
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Alabaster, AL · Matthews, NC · How this is calculated: methodology