Woodland vs SeaTac

Which is the better fit for you?

Woodland, CA
48
Area Score
Bottom 15% nationally
SeaTac, WA
52
Area Score
Bottom 25% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

SeaTac receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Woodland to SeaTac

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% higher
Regional price level 112.7 against 109.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$127 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,231 in SeaTac against $2,104 in Woodland.
The median home
5% less
$519,700 in SeaTac against $548,200 in Woodland.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 38°F in SeaTac against 38°F in Woodland; July highs are 77°F against 94°F (summers 17°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

30 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Woodland
SeaTac
Opportunity
40 · Bottom 17%
vs
40 · Bottom 17%
Growth: SeaTac is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
31 · Bottom 16%
vs
39 · Bottom 27%
Climate: Woodland is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 30%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: SeaTac is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
28 · Bottom 22%
vs
41 · Bottom 31%
Housing affordability: Woodland is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
53 · Bottom 24%
vs
49 · Bottom 20%
Schools: SeaTac is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
53 · Top 45%
vs
60 · Top 36%
Access: Woodland is the more favorable of the two.
Access
100 · Top 4%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability
60 · Top 45%
vs
60 · Top 46%

Measured values

MetricWoodlandSeaTacSource period
Population61,85432,4142024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$90,180 ±$7,540$81,104 ±$9,9912024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$38,727 ±$1,615$38,330 ±$2,6362024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,039/sq mi3,221/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$548,200$519,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,583 ±$102$1,660 ±$702024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,104 — more favorable$2,231FY2026
Cost of living index109.1 — more favorable112.72023
Homeownership rate58.7%46.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.9%5.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.3%−1.3% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher30.4% — more favorable26.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.7% ±2%9.4% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)481712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.8 — more favorable0.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−53.4%−95.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F77°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low38°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation18.0"39.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi1 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate26.1 min ±1.1 min27.9 min ±1.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.636.82024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher21.418.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency45.8%58.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.9%70.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

California and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Woodland

Elevated or high exposure: drought, earthquake.

SeaTac

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Woodland
—
Woodland: Your Score
48
Area Score
SeaTac
—
SeaTac: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Woodland, CA · SeaTac, WA · How this is calculated: methodology