West Seneca vs Cranston

Which is the better fit for you?

West Seneca, NY
66
Area Score
Top 25% nationally
Cranston, RI
64
Area Score
Top 32% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

West Seneca receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from West Seneca to Cranston

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
7% higher
Regional price level 101.5 against 94.9 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
63% more
$378,300 in Cranston against $232,800 in West Seneca.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Cranston against 19°F in West Seneca; July highs are 84°F against 80°F (summers 4°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

West Seneca
Cranston
Opportunity: West Seneca is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
61 · Top 39%
vs
58 · Top 45%
Growth
44 · Bottom 36%
vs
44 · Bottom 36%
Climate: Cranston is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
65 · Bottom 33%
Physical resilience: West Seneca is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
80 · Top 25%
vs
72 · Top 33%
Housing affordability: West Seneca is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 24%
vs
71 · Top 35%
Access: Cranston is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: West Seneca is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
62 · Top 43%
vs
57 · Bottom 49%

Measured values

MetricWest SenecaCranstonSource period
Population45,30383,2502024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$79,709$90,206 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$43,684 ±$1,826$45,258 ±$1,6872024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,118/sq mi2,937/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$232,800$378,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,106 — more favorable$1,3752024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index94.9 — more favorable101.52023
Homeownership rate76.9%67.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%3.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8% — more favorable−1.9%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate34.5% ±2%36.4% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate8.5% ±2%10.6% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,1835412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.2 — more favorable0.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+17.6%+3.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high80°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.7"47.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi4 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute23.4 min — more favorable26.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.539.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools11242024-25 school year
Students per teacher11.8 — more favorable13.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency66.9%30.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency62.6%47.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility34.3%56.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

New York and Rhode Island do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

West Seneca

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Cranston

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

West Seneca
—
West Seneca: Your Score
66
Area Score
Cranston
—
Cranston: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: West Seneca, NY · Cranston, RI · How this is calculated: methodology