Waverly vs Hopkins

Which is the better fit for you?

Waverly, MI
57
Area Score
Bottom 45% nationally
Hopkins, MN
58
Area Score
Bottom 48% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Hopkins receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Waverly to Hopkins

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
12% higher
Regional price level 104.3 against 93.0 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$441 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,709 in Hopkins against $1,268 in Waverly.
The median home
60% more
$375,600 in Hopkins against $234,600 in Waverly.
The weather you would swap
Winters 9°F colder
Normal January lows are 8°F in Hopkins against 17°F in Waverly; July highs are 84°F against 83°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Waverly
Hopkins
Opportunity: Hopkins is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 13%
vs
45 · Bottom 27%
Growth: Waverly is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
27 · Bottom 11%
vs
20 · Bottom 5%
Climate: Waverly is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
61 · Bottom 18%
vs
54 · Bottom 4%
Physical resilience: Hopkins is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
83 · Top 18%
vs
93 · Top 7%
Housing affordability: Waverly is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
83 · Top 7%
vs
73 · Top 32%
Schools: Hopkins is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
40 · Bottom 37%
vs
45 · Bottom 44%
Access: Waverly is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Hopkins is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
62 · Top 41%
vs
64 · Top 38%

Measured values

MetricWaverlyHopkinsSource period
Population23,57518,8192024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$75,700 ±$4,522$75,234 ±$5,8472024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$47,266 ±$3,817$48,787 ±$4,1602024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,590/sq mi4,635/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$234,600$375,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,170 — more favorable$1,4682024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,268 — more favorable$1,709FY2026
Cost of living index93.0 — more favorable104.32023
Homeownership rate55.7%36.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.6%4.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−6.7%−2.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate44.1% ±3%45.6% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate9.8% ±2%10.1% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)111712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.0 — more favorable0.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−3.5%−97.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high83°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low17°F8°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.3"30.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport4 mi — more favorable9 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate20.1 min ±1.2 min20.8 min ±1.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.737.82024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.315.2 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.9%53.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.3%59.0%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Michigan and Minnesota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Waverly

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, tornado.

Hopkins

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Waverly
—
Waverly: Your Score
57
Area Score
Hopkins
—
Hopkins: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Waverly, MI · Hopkins, MN · How this is calculated: methodology