Waukegan vs Zion

Which is the better fit for you?

Waukegan, IL
59
Area Score
Top 49% nationally
Zion, IL
56
Area Score
Bottom 40% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Waukegan receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Waukegan to Zion

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$60 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,490 in Zion against $1,430 in Waukegan.
The median home
4% less
$183,800 in Zion against $190,900 in Waukegan.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 16°F in Zion against 16°F in Waukegan; July highs are 81°F against 81°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Waukegan
Zion
Opportunity: Waukegan is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 43%
vs
50 · Bottom 37%
Growth: Zion is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
42 · Bottom 32%
vs
46 · Bottom 41%
Climate
60 · Bottom 15%
vs
60 · Bottom 15%
Physical resilience
80 · Top 23%
vs
80 · Top 23%
Housing affordability: Waukegan is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 28%
vs
69 · Top 42%
Schools: Waukegan is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
24 · Bottom 17%
vs
19 · Bottom 12%
Access: Waukegan is the more favorable of the two.
Access
87 · Bottom 33%
vs
83 · Bottom 25%
Economic stability: Waukegan is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
50 · Bottom 36%
vs
48 · Bottom 33%

Measured values

MetricWaukeganZionSource period
Population89,07624,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$71,919 ±$3,861$63,104 ±$10,1232024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$33,249 ±$1,375$32,277 ±$4,8812024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,672/sq mi2,474/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$190,900$183,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,205 ±$38$1,186 ±$962024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,430 — more favorable$1,490FY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate50.2%57.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.0% — more favorable4.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.5%+0.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher20.9% — more favorable15.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.9% ±2%15.8% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)132212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.10.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+85.7%+69.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high81°F81°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low16°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation35.3"35.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport27 mi — more favorable33 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate28.3 min ±0.9 min29.6 min ±1.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.532.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools24122024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.6 — more favorable14.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency15.8% — more favorable12.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency17.9%21.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility69.4%68.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Waukegan
—
Waukegan: Your Score
59
Area Score
Zion
—
Zion: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Waukegan, IL · Zion, IL · How this is calculated: methodology