Van Wert vs Marshfield

Which is the better fit for you?

Van Wert, OH
65
Area Score
Top 28% nationally
Marshfield, WI
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Van Wert and Marshfield receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Van Wert to Marshfield

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Van Wert or Marshfield, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Marshfield against $973 in Van Wert.
The median home
44% more
$177,800 in Marshfield against $123,900 in Van Wert.
The weather you would swap
Winters 11°F colder
Normal January lows are 7°F in Marshfield against 18°F in Van Wert; July highs are 80°F against 85°F (summers 5°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Van Wert
Marshfield
Opportunity: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
54 · Bottom 45%
vs
63 · Top 37%
Growth: Van Wert is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
46 · Bottom 40%
vs
44 · Bottom 37%
Climate: Van Wert is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 20%
vs
54 · Bottom 3%
Physical resilience: Van Wert is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
86 · Top 15%
vs
78 · Top 27%
Housing affordability
86 · Top 4%
vs
86 · Top 5%
Schools: Van Wert is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
68 · Top 27%
vs
67 · Top 27%
Access: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Access
62 · Bottom 7%
vs
63 · Bottom 7%
Economic stability: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
44 · Bottom 26%
vs
53 · Bottom 40%

Measured values

MetricVan WertMarshfieldSource period
Population10,79018,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$55,113 ±$2,831$58,407 ±$3,1022024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$30,872$40,778 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,433/sq mi1,355/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$123,900$177,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$765 ±$83$842 ±$732024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$973$973FY2026
Homeownership rate71.0%60.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.9% — more favorable3.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.1%+2.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher16.0%25.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.5% ±3%11.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)232612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.1 — more favorable1.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+35.3%−10.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F80°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low18°F7°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.4"24.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport64 mi — more favorable66 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate17.5 min ±1.6 min16.1 min ±1.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.243.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools782024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.6 — more favorable14.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency66.3%46.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency69.9%52.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility63.5%36.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Ohio and Wisconsin do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Van Wert

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, tornado.

Marshfield

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Van Wert
—
Van Wert: Your Score
65
Area Score
Marshfield
—
Marshfield: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Van Wert, OH · Marshfield, WI · How this is calculated: methodology