Texarkana vs Grenada

Which is the better fit for you?

Texarkana, AR
50
Area Score
Bottom 21% nationally
Grenada, MS
56
Area Score
Bottom 40% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Grenada receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Texarkana to Grenada

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Grenada, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$190 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $911 in Grenada against $1,101 in Texarkana.
The median home
14% less
$145,600 in Grenada against $170,200 in Texarkana.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 35°F in Grenada against 35°F in Texarkana; July highs are 92°F against 93°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Texarkana
Grenada
Opportunity: Texarkana is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
44 · Bottom 24%
vs
43 · Bottom 22%
Growth: Grenada is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
45 · Bottom 38%
vs
57 · Top 36%
Climate: Grenada is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 42%
vs
73 · Top 37%
Physical resilience: Grenada is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
31 · Bottom 25%
vs
37 · Bottom 30%
Housing affordability: Grenada is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
71 · Top 38%
vs
72 · Top 35%
Schools: Grenada is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
55 · Top 42%
vs
77 · Top 16%
Access: Grenada is the more favorable of the two.
Access
57 · Bottom 5%
vs
60 · Bottom 6%
Economic stability: Grenada is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
18 · Bottom 2%
vs
25 · Bottom 5%

Measured values

MetricTexarkanaGrenadaSource period
Population29,17712,3752024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$45,835 ±$4,200$46,303 ±$6,7502024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$28,462 ±$2,437$26,202 ±$3,4332024 ACS 5-Year
Population density695/sq mi412/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$170,200$145,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$909$802 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,101$911 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate54.7%56.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.9%4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8% — more favorable−3.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher15.4%25.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate24.2% ±3%27.8% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)431912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.51.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+43.3%+850.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F92°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low35°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation48.9"51.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport69 mi — more favorable70 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate18.5 min ±1.0 min18.4 min ±2.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.637.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1252024-25 school year
Students per teacher11.7 — more favorable14.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency47.7%65.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency42.7%52.0%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility84.6%73.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Arkansas and Mississippi do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Texarkana

Elevated or high exposure: hail, ice storm, drought.

Grenada

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, tornado, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Texarkana
—
Texarkana: Your Score
50
Area Score
Grenada
—
Grenada: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Texarkana, AR · Grenada, MS · How this is calculated: methodology