Taylors vs Wade Hampton

Which is the better fit for you?

Taylors, SC
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally
Wade Hampton, SC
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Taylors and Wade Hampton receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Taylors to Wade Hampton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 93.1 against 93.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,339 in Wade Hampton against $1,339 in Taylors.
The median home
32% more
$339,000 in Wade Hampton against $257,500 in Taylors.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 35°F in Wade Hampton against 35°F in Taylors; July highs are 91°F against 91°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Taylors
Wade Hampton
Opportunity: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
85 · Top 3%
vs
84 · Top 3%
Growth
71 · Top 14%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate
70 · Bottom 48%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience
64 · Top 44%
vs
64 · Top 44%
Housing affordability: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 17%
vs
73 · Top 30%
Schools: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
79 · Top 12%
vs
78 · Top 14%
Access: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 24%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
57 · Bottom 47%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricTaylorsWade HamptonSource period
Population24,50520,8982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$77,144 ±$12,476$77,449 ±$5,2222024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,997$43,359 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,320/sq mi2,381/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$257,500$339,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,337$1,115 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,339$1,339FY2026
Cost of living index93.193.12023
Homeownership rate74.1%64.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+4.5%+4.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate46.8% ±4%46.0% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.7% ±4%6.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4,8734,87312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents8.98.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.1%−10.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low35°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation47.0"47.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.3 min ±1.0 min21.8 min ±1.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.538.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools952024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.514.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency64.6%65.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency69.7% — more favorable63.1%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Taylors

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, earthquake.

Wade Hampton

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Taylors
—
Taylors: Your Score
75
Area Score
Wade Hampton
—
Wade Hampton: Your Score
75
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Taylors, SC · Wade Hampton, SC · How this is calculated: methodology