Taylor vs Warren

Which is the better fit for you?

Taylor, MI
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally
Warren, MI
52
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Warren receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Taylor to Warren

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$229 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,439 in Warren against $1,210 in Taylor.
The median home
27% more
$193,400 in Warren against $152,600 in Taylor.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 20°F in Warren against 19°F in Taylor; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Taylor
Warren
Opportunity: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
28 · Bottom 5%
vs
29 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 7%
vs
46 · Bottom 41%
Climate: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 24%
vs
63 · Bottom 28%
Physical resilience: Taylor is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 22%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Taylor is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 10%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
22 · Bottom 15%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Taylor is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
40 · Bottom 22%
vs
47 · Bottom 31%

Measured values

MetricTaylorWarrenSource period
Population62,081137,9282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$61,081 ±$2,820$64,016 ±$2,6382024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$31,718 ±$1,651$33,015 ±$1,0942024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,629/sq mi4,012/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$152,600$193,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,101 — more favorable$1,2252024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,210 — more favorable$1,439FY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate66.7%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.8% — more favorable7.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.0%−0.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher16.4%21.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate17.0%14.4% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3410112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.50.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−20.9%+274.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F20°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.3"29.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport4 mi — more favorable26 miNASR current cycle
Average commute23.5 min — more favorable26.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.938.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools15402024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.9 — more favorable17.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency24.5%25.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency35.2%36.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility76.8%74.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Taylor
—
Taylor: Your Score
51
Area Score
Warren
—
Warren: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Taylor, MI · Warren, MI · How this is calculated: methodology