Sterling Heights vs Woodhaven

Which is the better fit for you?

Sterling Heights, MI
61
Area Score
Top 43% nationally
Woodhaven, MI
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Sterling Heights receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Sterling Heights to Woodhaven

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$15 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,380 in Woodhaven against $1,395 in Sterling Heights.
The median home
15% less
$231,800 in Woodhaven against $274,300 in Sterling Heights.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 19°F in Woodhaven against 18°F in Sterling Heights; July highs are 84°F against 82°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Sterling Heights
Woodhaven
Opportunity: Sterling Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
38 · Bottom 14%
vs
35 · Bottom 11%
Growth: Sterling Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
63 · Top 24%
vs
8 · Bottom 1%
Climate
62 · Bottom 19%
vs
62 · Bottom 24%
Physical resilience: Woodhaven is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
80 · Top 25%
vs
81 · Top 21%
Housing affordability: Woodhaven is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
67 · Top 49%
vs
86 · Top 5%
Schools: Sterling Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
57 · Top 40%
vs
31 · Bottom 27%
Access: Woodhaven is the more favorable of the two.
Access
85 · Bottom 28%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Woodhaven is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
54 · Bottom 44%
vs
58 · Top 50%

Measured values

MetricSterling HeightsWoodhavenSource period
Population133,57312,6902024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$79,909 ±$3,056$78,648 ±$12,9382024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$38,084 ±$987$39,017 ±$2,9992024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,665/sq mi1,987/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$274,300$231,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,292$1,096 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,395$1,380 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate75.8%74.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate6.4% — more favorable7.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.6% — more favorable−1.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate31.1% ±1%27.0% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.0% ±1%13.1% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)728112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.5 — more favorable0.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+89.6%−96.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low18°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation35.0"34.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport30 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate26.9 min ±0.6 min25.9 min ±1.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.745.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.6 — more favorable17.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency43.8% — more favorable30.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency53.7% — more favorable39.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Sterling Heights
—
Sterling Heights: Your Score
61
Area Score
Woodhaven
—
Woodhaven: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Sterling Heights, MI · Woodhaven, MI · How this is calculated: methodology