Sterling vs Rio Grande City

Which is the better fit for you?

Sterling, CO
39
Area Score
Bottom 2% nationally
Rio Grande City, TX
49
Area Score
Bottom 18% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rio Grande City receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Sterling to Rio Grande City

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Sterling or Rio Grande City, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$128 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Rio Grande City against $1,101 in Sterling.
The median home
48% less
$113,200 in Rio Grande City against $217,400 in Sterling.
The weather you would swap
Winters 29°F milder
Normal January lows are 45°F in Rio Grande City against 16°F in Sterling; July highs are 99°F against 91°F (summers 8°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Sterling
Rio Grande City
Opportunity: Rio Grande City is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
29 · Bottom 5%
vs
36 · Bottom 12%
Growth: Rio Grande City is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
3 · Bottom 1%
vs
28 · Bottom 12%
Climate: Rio Grande City is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
56 · Bottom 7%
vs
68 · Bottom 41%
Physical resilience: Rio Grande City is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
44 · Bottom 34%
vs
58 · Top 49%
Housing affordability: Rio Grande City is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
56 · Bottom 30%
vs
70 · Top 41%
Schools: Sterling is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
48 · Bottom 47%
vs
47 · Bottom 46%
Access: Sterling is the more favorable of the two.
Access
57 · Bottom 5%
vs
54 · Bottom 5%
Economic stability: Sterling is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
31 · Bottom 10%
vs
23 · Bottom 4%

Measured values

MetricSterlingRio Grande CitySource period
Population13,17215,3962024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$43,283 ±$3,767$44,577 ±$7,1942024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$22,573 — more favorable$19,5392024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,729/sq mi1,356/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$217,400$113,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,031$767 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,101$973 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate55.9%69.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable9.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.5%+0.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate15.7% ±3%18.8% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate18.9% — more favorable28.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)0012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.00.012 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F99°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low16°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation15.2"22.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport77 mi73 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute15.9 min — more favorable22.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.729.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools5162024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.914.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency34.2%50.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency46.9%40.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility52.7%94.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Colorado and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Sterling

Elevated or high exposure: hail, cold wave, tornado.

Rio Grande City

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Sterling
—
Sterling: Your Score
39
Area Score
Rio Grande City
—
Rio Grande City: Your Score
49
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Sterling, CO · Rio Grande City, TX · How this is calculated: methodology