St. Matthews vs Live Oak

Which is the better fit for you?

St. Matthews, KY
62
Area Score
Top 39% nationally
Live Oak, TX
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

St. Matthews receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from St. Matthews to Live Oak

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% higher
Regional price level 94.3 against 93.2 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$170 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,400 in Live Oak against $1,570 in St. Matthews.
The median home
27% less
$246,300 in Live Oak against $338,000 in St. Matthews.
The weather you would swap
Winters 14°F milder
Normal January lows are 41°F in Live Oak against 27°F in St. Matthews; July highs are 96°F against 88°F (summers 8°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

St. Matthews
Live Oak
Opportunity: St. Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
61 · Top 39%
vs
59 · Top 44%
Growth: St. Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
56 · Top 37%
vs
53 · Top 44%
Climate: St. Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
76 · Top 27%
vs
72 · Top 42%
Physical resilience
46 · Bottom 37%
vs
46 · Bottom 37%
Housing affordability: Live Oak is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
82 · Top 8%
vs
85 · Top 5%
Schools: Live Oak is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
38 · Bottom 35%
vs
43 · Bottom 41%
Access: Live Oak is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: St. Matthews is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
73 · Top 17%
vs
68 · Top 28%

Measured values

MetricSt. MatthewsLive OakSource period
Population17,57715,9842024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$82,412 ±$7,749$79,696 ±$3,5032024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$55,655 — more favorable$41,4852024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,988/sq mi3,360/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$338,000$246,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,369 — more favorable$1,6342024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,570$1,400 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index93.2 — more favorable94.32023
Homeownership rate53.3%57.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.2%4.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.6% — more favorable−0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher58.7% — more favorable32.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.7% ±2%5.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,6714412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.4 — more favorable2.812 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−6.3%−17.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high88°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low27°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi — more favorable8 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate21.5 min ±1.3 min22.5 min ±1.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.535.72024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.015.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.4%46.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency50.5%45.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kentucky and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

St. Matthews

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Live Oak

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

St. Matthews
—
St. Matthews: Your Score
62
Area Score
Live Oak
—
Live Oak: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: St. Matthews, KY · Live Oak, TX · How this is calculated: methodology