Southaven vs Atoka

Which is the better fit for you?

Southaven, MS
60
Area Score
Top 45% nationally
Atoka, TN
66
Area Score
Top 25% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Atoka receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Southaven to Atoka

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 91.9 against 91.9 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$294 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,260 in Atoka against $1,554 in Southaven.
The median home
36% more
$320,700 in Atoka against $236,300 in Southaven.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 33°F in Atoka against 33°F in Southaven; July highs are 92°F against 92°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Southaven
Atoka
Opportunity: Atoka is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
57 · Top 47%
vs
59 · Top 43%
Growth: Atoka is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
38 · Bottom 26%
vs
61 · Top 27%
Climate
68 · Bottom 40%
vs
68 · Bottom 40%
Physical resilience: Atoka is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Bottom 49%
vs
58 · Top 49%
Housing affordability: Atoka is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
87 · Top 3%
Schools: Southaven is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
58 · Top 40%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Atoka is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
54 · Bottom 42%
vs
66 · Top 33%

Measured values

MetricSouthavenAtokaSource period
Population56,22610,3852024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$78,483 ±$3,946$89,663 ±$13,5652024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$35,303$41,219 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,361/sq mi856/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$236,300$320,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,445$1,237 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,554$1,260 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index91.991.92023
Homeownership rate72.5%85.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8%3.8%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate28.8% ±2%35.2% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate12.0%6.7% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)913812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.63.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−54.5%−2.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high92°F92°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F33°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation54.9"54.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable7 miNASR current cycle
Average commute25.9 min — more favorable38.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.239.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1012024-25 school year
Math proficiency58.6%44.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency45.2%37.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Mississippi and Tennessee do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Southaven

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Atoka

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Southaven
—
Southaven: Your Score
60
Area Score
Atoka
—
Atoka: Your Score
66
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Southaven, MS · Atoka, TN · How this is calculated: methodology