Snohomish vs Washougal

Which is the better fit for you?

Snohomish, WA
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally
Washougal, WA
54
Area Score
Bottom 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Washougal receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Snohomish to Washougal

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
5% lower
Regional price level 106.7 against 112.7 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$579 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,922 in Washougal against $2,501 in Snohomish.
The median home
19% less
$552,300 in Washougal against $683,900 in Snohomish.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 37°F in Washougal against 37°F in Snohomish; July highs are 82°F against 72°F (summers 10°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Snohomish
Washougal
Opportunity: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
52 · Bottom 41%
vs
57 · Top 47%
Growth: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
31 · Bottom 16%
vs
35 · Bottom 22%
Climate: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
78 · Top 22%
Physical resilience: Snohomish is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
45 · Bottom 35%
vs
41 · Bottom 32%
Housing affordability: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
42 · Bottom 12%
vs
55 · Bottom 28%
Schools: Snohomish is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
48 · Bottom 47%
vs
42 · Bottom 40%
Access: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Access
82 · Bottom 24%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Washougal is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Bottom 49%
vs
66 · Top 33%

Measured values

MetricSnohomishWashougalSource period
Population10,23917,4902024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$87,250$106,368 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$51,704 ±$5,630$47,629 ±$4,4722024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,908/sq mi2,939/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$683,900$552,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,654 ±$314$1,701 ±$872024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,501$1,922 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.7106.7 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate55.4%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.0%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.7% — more favorable−1.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.4% — more favorable28.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.9% ±2%11.7% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)84212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.82.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−84.9%−88.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high72°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.4"40.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport29 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute31.9 min27.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.538.42024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.8 — more favorable19.32024-25 school year
Math proficiency52.5% — more favorable49.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency67.4% — more favorable64.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Snohomish

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Washougal

Elevated or high exposure: volcanic activity.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Snohomish
—
Snohomish: Your Score
51
Area Score
Washougal
—
Washougal: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Snohomish, WA · Washougal, WA · How this is calculated: methodology