Short Pump vs Tuckahoe

Which is the better fit for you?

Short Pump, VA
72
Area Score
Top 10% nationally
Tuckahoe, VA
70
Area Score
Top 13% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Short Pump receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Short Pump to Tuckahoe

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.3 against 98.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,655 in Tuckahoe against $1,655 in Short Pump.
The median home
19% less
$462,800 in Tuckahoe against $568,900 in Short Pump.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 28°F in Tuckahoe against 28°F in Short Pump; July highs are 89°F against 89°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Short Pump
Tuckahoe
Opportunity: Short Pump is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
64 · Top 34%
vs
61 · Top 40%
Growth
52 · Top 46%
vs
52 · Top 46%
Climate
75 · Top 28%
vs
75 · Top 28%
Physical resilience: Tuckahoe is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
84 · Top 17%
vs
85 · Top 17%
Housing affordability: Short Pump is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
82 · Top 9%
vs
70 · Top 40%
Schools: Tuckahoe is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
66 · Top 30%
vs
74 · Top 19%
Access: Tuckahoe is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 45%
vs
93 · Top 47%
Economic stability: Short Pump is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
79 · Top 6%
vs
66 · Top 34%

Measured values

MetricShort PumpTuckahoeSource period
Population29,02649,1832024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$138,845 — more favorable$102,2642024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$71,693 — more favorable$64,0152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,237/sq mi2,406/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$568,900$462,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,847$1,536 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,655$1,655FY2026
Cost of living index98.398.32023
Homeownership rate57.9%63.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%3.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher75.1% — more favorable56.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate2.9% — more favorable7.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,7261,72612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.15.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−0.6%−0.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F89°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low28°F28°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.8"45.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi16 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.0 min ±1.2 min22.4 min ±0.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.640.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools882024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.4 — more favorable17.02024-25 school year
Math proficiency86.5%88.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency83.7%87.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility48.8%56.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Short Pump

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, drought.

Tuckahoe

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Short Pump
—
Short Pump: Your Score
72
Area Score
Tuckahoe
—
Tuckahoe: Your Score
70
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Short Pump, VA · Tuckahoe, VA · How this is calculated: methodology