Saratoga Springs vs South Jordan

Which is the better fit for you?

Saratoga Springs, UT
64
Area Score
Top 32% nationally
South Jordan, UT
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

South Jordan receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Saratoga Springs to South Jordan

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% higher
Regional price level 97.1 against 95.7 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$287 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,747 in South Jordan against $1,460 in Saratoga Springs.
The median home
7% more
$650,500 in South Jordan against $605,500 in Saratoga Springs.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F milder
Normal January lows are 24°F in South Jordan against 19°F in Saratoga Springs; July highs are 94°F against 92°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Saratoga Springs
South Jordan
Opportunity: South Jordan is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
79 · Top 10%
vs
83 · Top 4%
Growth: South Jordan is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
81 · Top 4%
vs
82 · Top 3%
Climate: Saratoga Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
57 · Bottom 9%
vs
55 · Bottom 6%
Physical resilience: South Jordan is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
49 · Bottom 42%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Housing affordability: South Jordan is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
61 · Bottom 38%
vs
63 · Bottom 42%
Schools: South Jordan is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
39 · Bottom 36%
vs
59 · Top 38%
Access: Saratoga Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
95 · Top 36%
Economic stability: South Jordan is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
67 · Top 30%
vs
77 · Top 8%

Measured values

MetricSaratoga SpringsSouth JordanSource period
Population48,42582,6862024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$128,802 ±$7,451$134,047 ±$7,2922024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,518$51,766 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,075/sq mi3,210/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$605,500$650,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,256$1,991 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,460 — more favorable$1,747FY2026
Cost of living index95.7 — more favorable97.12023
Homeownership rate84.5%81.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8%3.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.4%+1.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher51.7% — more favorable47.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.9% ±2%3.7% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,26492212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents26.1 — more favorable11.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−22.2%+18.7% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high92°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F24°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation13.1"15.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi — more favorable16 miNASR current cycle
Average commute31.2 min26.0 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age24.036.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools11202024-25 school year
Students per teacher24.821.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency43.8%48.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency49.5%51.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility14.7%17.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Saratoga Springs

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire.

South Jordan

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Saratoga Springs
—
Saratoga Springs: Your Score
64
Area Score
South Jordan
—
South Jordan: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Saratoga Springs, UT · South Jordan, UT · How this is calculated: methodology