Santa Fe vs Lancaster

Which is the better fit for you?

Santa Fe, NM
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally
Lancaster, TX
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Santa Fe receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Santa Fe to Lancaster

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
9% higher
Regional price level 102.5 against 94.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$308 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,993 in Lancaster against $1,685 in Santa Fe.
The median home
45% less
$246,300 in Lancaster against $444,900 in Santa Fe.
The weather you would swap
Winters 18°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Lancaster against 20°F in Santa Fe; July highs are 96°F against 89°F (summers 7°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

26 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Santa Fe
Lancaster
Opportunity: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
44 · Bottom 24%
vs
45 · Bottom 26%
Growth: Santa Fe is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
68 · Top 18%
vs
49 · Bottom 47%
Climate: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 24%
vs
68 · Bottom 41%
Physical resilience: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
50 · Bottom 44%
vs
52 · Bottom 46%
Housing affordability: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
47 · Bottom 18%
vs
48 · Bottom 18%
Schools: Lancaster is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
27 · Bottom 22%
vs
30 · Bottom 25%
Access: Santa Fe is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
94 · Top 42%
Economic stability: Santa Fe is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
52 · Bottom 38%
vs
49 · Bottom 35%

Measured values

MetricSanta FeLancasterSource period
Population89,01940,8202024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$73,482 ±$3,581$68,302 ±$8,1532024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$50,299 — more favorable$31,6892024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,704/sq mi1,235/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$444,900$246,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,463 — more favorable$1,7042024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,685 — more favorable$1,993FY2026
Cost of living index94.1 — more favorable102.52023
Homeownership rate63.6%68.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.7% — more favorable6.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.0%−0.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher47.8% — more favorable25.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.6% ±2%14.9% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5555912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.2 — more favorable1.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+143.4%+103.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation10.7"37.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi — more favorable18 miNASR current cycle
Average commute22.9 min — more favorable31.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age46.335.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools29152024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.8 — more favorable15.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency17.5%44.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency30.4%38.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility94.8%81.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

New Mexico and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Santa Fe

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake.

Lancaster

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Santa Fe
—
Santa Fe: Your Score
52
Area Score
Lancaster
—
Lancaster: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Santa Fe, NM · Lancaster, TX · How this is calculated: methodology