San Francisco vs San Mateo

Which is the better fit for you?

San Francisco, CA
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally
San Mateo, CA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

San Francisco receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from San Francisco to San Mateo

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 117.6 against 117.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $3,604 in San Mateo against $3,604 in San Francisco.
The median home
16% more
$1,618,700 in San Mateo against $1,394,500 in San Francisco.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 45°F in San Mateo against 47°F in San Francisco; July highs are 73°F against 66°F (summers 7°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

San Francisco
San Mateo
Opportunity: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 43%
vs
60 · Top 42%
Growth: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
37 · Bottom 24%
vs
29 · Bottom 13%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
45 · Bottom 36%
vs
37 · Bottom 30%
Housing affordability: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
48 · Bottom 19%
vs
34 · Bottom 6%
Schools: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
51 · Top 48%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Access
81 · Bottom 23%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
67 · Top 31%

Measured values

MetricSan FranciscoSan MateoSource period
Population830,235103,1052024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$140,970$153,504 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$92,289 — more favorable$84,2472024 ACS 5-Year
Population density17,784/sq mi8,497/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,394,500$1,618,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,476 — more favorable$3,0772024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,604$3,604FY2026
Cost of living index117.6117.62023
Homeownership rate38.2%49.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9%3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.7%−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher60.3% — more favorable57.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate10.6%7.9% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,6229812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable1.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+27.9%−34.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high66°F73°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low47°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation22.9"19.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport37 mi5 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute33.1 min28.6 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.038.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools128192024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.520.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency46.6%48.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.4%61.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility54.3%37.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

San Francisco

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

San Mateo

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

San Francisco
—
San Francisco: Your Score
56
Area Score
San Mateo
—
San Mateo: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: San Francisco, CA · San Mateo, CA · How this is calculated: methodology