San Bruno vs San Mateo

Which is the better fit for you?

San Bruno, CA
52
Area Score
Bottom 27% nationally
San Mateo, CA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

San Mateo receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from San Bruno to San Mateo

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 117.6 against 117.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $3,604 in San Mateo against $3,604 in San Bruno.
The median home
34% more
$1,618,700 in San Mateo against $1,207,500 in San Bruno.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 45°F in San Mateo against 45°F in San Bruno; July highs are 73°F against 73°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

San Bruno
San Mateo
Opportunity: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 43%
vs
60 · Top 42%
Growth: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
19 · Bottom 5%
vs
29 · Bottom 13%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience
37 · Bottom 30%
vs
37 · Bottom 30%
Housing affordability: San Bruno is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
35 · Bottom 6%
vs
34 · Bottom 6%
Schools: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
51 · Top 49%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: San Bruno is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
70 · Top 24%
vs
67 · Top 31%

Measured values

MetricSan BrunoSan MateoSource period
Population42,307103,1052024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$141,272$153,504 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$64,768$84,247 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density7,708/sq mi8,497/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,207,500$1,618,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,773 — more favorable$3,0772024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,604$3,604FY2026
Cost of living index117.6117.62023
Homeownership rate62.1%49.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8% — more favorable3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.7%−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher45.2%57.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.2% ±2%7.9% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)799812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.9 — more favorable1.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−35.8%−34.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high73°F73°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.6"19.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi — more favorable5 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.1 min — more favorable28.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.838.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools8192024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.920.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency45.8%48.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.9%61.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility42.5%37.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

San Bruno

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

San Mateo

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

San Bruno
—
San Bruno: Your Score
52
Area Score
San Mateo
—
San Mateo: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: San Bruno, CA · San Mateo, CA · How this is calculated: methodology