San Bruno vs San Francisco

Which is the better fit for you?

San Bruno, CA
52
Area Score
Bottom 27% nationally
San Francisco, CA
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

San Francisco receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from San Bruno to San Francisco

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 117.6 against 117.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $3,604 in San Francisco against $3,604 in San Bruno.
The median home
15% more
$1,394,500 in San Francisco against $1,207,500 in San Bruno.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 47°F in San Francisco against 45°F in San Bruno; July highs are 66°F against 73°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

San Bruno
San Francisco
Opportunity
59 · Top 43%
vs
59 · Top 43%
Growth: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
19 · Bottom 5%
vs
37 · Bottom 24%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
37 · Bottom 30%
vs
45 · Bottom 36%
Housing affordability: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
35 · Bottom 6%
vs
48 · Bottom 19%
Schools
51 · Top 49%
vs
51 · Top 48%
Access: San Bruno is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
81 · Bottom 23%
Economic stability: San Bruno is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
70 · Top 24%
vs
56 · Bottom 46%

Measured values

MetricSan BrunoSan FranciscoSource period
Population42,307830,2352024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$141,272 ±$9,325$140,970 ±$2,5932024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$64,768$92,289 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density7,708/sq mi17,784/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,207,500$1,394,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,773$2,476 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,604$3,604FY2026
Cost of living index117.6117.62023
Homeownership rate62.1%38.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8% — more favorable3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.7%−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher45.2%60.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.2% — more favorable10.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)791,62212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.92.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−35.8%+27.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high73°F66°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F47°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.6"22.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi — more favorable37 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.1 min — more favorable33.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.840.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools81282024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.921.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency45.8%46.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.9% — more favorable55.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility42.5%54.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

San Bruno

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

San Francisco

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

San Bruno
—
San Bruno: Your Score
52
Area Score
San Francisco
—
San Francisco: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: San Bruno, CA · San Francisco, CA · How this is calculated: methodology