Saks vs Sylacauga

Which is the better fit for you?

Saks, AL
48
Area Score
Bottom 16% nationally
Sylacauga, AL
45
Area Score
Bottom 8% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Saks receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Saks to Sylacauga

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Sylacauga, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$148 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $814 in Sylacauga against $962 in Saks.
The median home
38% more
$161,200 in Sylacauga against $116,400 in Saks.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F colder
Normal January lows are 31°F in Sylacauga against 34°F in Saks; July highs are 90°F against 90°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Saks
Sylacauga
Opportunity: Saks is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
36 · Bottom 11%
vs
34 · Bottom 10%
Growth: Saks is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
35 · Bottom 22%
vs
25 · Bottom 10%
Climate: Saks is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
78 · Top 21%
vs
76 · Top 26%
Physical resilience: Saks is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
43 · Bottom 34%
vs
34 · Bottom 27%
Housing affordability: Saks is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
90 · Top 2%
vs
84 · Top 7%
Schools: Sylacauga is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
16 · Bottom 8%
vs
18 · Bottom 9%
Access: Sylacauga is the more favorable of the two.
Access
70 · Bottom 11%
vs
77 · Bottom 18%
Economic stability: Saks is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
32 · Bottom 12%
vs
29 · Bottom 8%

Measured values

MetricSaksSylacaugaSource period
Population10,68112,3092024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$49,753 ±$11,123$50,017 ±$8,5192024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$29,230 ±$3,781$25,429 ±$2,2332024 ACS 5-Year
Population density877/sq mi608/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$116,400$161,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$898 ±$184$773 ±$802024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$962$814 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate72.2%55.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.2%4.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.0% — more favorable−2.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate17.9% ±4%17.9% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate19.3% ±7%21.0% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)116012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.0 — more favorable0.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−32.6%+6.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low34°F31°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation52.1"57.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport53 mi38 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate24.2 min ±2.3 min24.4 min ±3.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.537.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools692024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.2 — more favorable17.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency32.6%35.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency33.7%35.2% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility74.9%61.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Saks

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Sylacauga

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Saks
—
Saks: Your Score
48
Area Score
Sylacauga
—
Sylacauga: Your Score
45
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Saks, AL · Sylacauga, AL · How this is calculated: methodology