Rutherford vs Secaucus

Which is the better fit for you?

Rutherford, NJ
68
Area Score
Top 18% nationally
Secaucus, NJ
62
Area Score
Top 38% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rutherford receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Rutherford to Secaucus

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$1,041 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $3,431 in Secaucus against $2,390 in Rutherford.
The median home
5% less
$571,900 in Secaucus against $603,600 in Rutherford.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 26°F in Secaucus against 26°F in Rutherford; July highs are 87°F against 87°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Rutherford
Secaucus
Opportunity: Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
83 · Top 4%
vs
81 · Top 6%
Growth: Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
36 · Bottom 24%
vs
30 · Bottom 15%
Climate
71 · Top 47%
vs
71 · Top 47%
Physical resilience: Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
47 · Bottom 38%
vs
29 · Bottom 23%
Housing affordability: Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
85 · Top 6%
vs
78 · Top 18%
Schools: Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
70 · Top 24%
vs
66 · Top 29%
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Rutherford is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
78 · Top 6%
vs
68 · Top 28%

Measured values

MetricRutherfordSecaucusSource period
Population18,89421,7782024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$143,153 ±$13,176$139,821 ±$14,8522024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$62,187$68,437 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density6,794/sq mi3,738/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$603,600$571,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,966 — more favorable$2,3912024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,390 — more favorable$3,431FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate64.3%50.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable4.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.5%+2.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate60.5% ±4%63.1% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate5.1% ±2%5.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)25212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.3 — more favorable0.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−62.7%−71.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high87°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low26°F26°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation46.3"46.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate37.3 min ±2.5 min35.7 min ±2.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.038.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools572024-25 school year
Students per teacher11.610.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.5% — more favorable41.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency66.1%69.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility6.0%36.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Rutherford

Elevated or high exposure: coastal flooding, earthquake.

Secaucus

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Rutherford
—
Rutherford: Your Score
68
Area Score
Secaucus
—
Secaucus: Your Score
62
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Rutherford, NJ · Secaucus, NJ · How this is calculated: methodology