Rosamond vs Shafter

Which is the better fit for you?

Rosamond, CA
41
Area Score
Bottom 4% nationally
Shafter, CA
45
Area Score
Bottom 8% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Shafter receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Rosamond to Shafter

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.4 against 102.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$587 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,483 in Shafter against $2,070 in Rosamond.
The median home
5% less
$335,800 in Shafter against $352,600 in Rosamond.
The weather you would swap
Winters 10°F milder
Normal January lows are 41°F in Shafter against 31°F in Rosamond; July highs are 98°F against 98°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Rosamond
Shafter
Opportunity: Rosamond is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
37 · Bottom 14%
vs
34 · Bottom 10%
Growth: Shafter is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
63 · Top 24%
vs
71 · Top 13%
Climate: Shafter is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
60 · Bottom 13%
vs
69 · Bottom 44%
Physical resilience
15 · Bottom 10%
vs
15 · Bottom 10%
Housing affordability: Shafter is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
54 · Bottom 26%
vs
65 · Bottom 46%
Schools: Shafter is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
6 · Bottom 1%
vs
11 · Bottom 4%
Access: Shafter is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 24%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: Rosamond is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
40 · Bottom 21%
vs
39 · Bottom 20%

Measured values

MetricRosamondShafterSource period
Population21,47321,1932024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$79,386 ±$8,656$71,215 ±$7,4582024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$30,634 — more favorable$24,1562024 ACS 5-Year
Population density412/sq mi548/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$352,600$335,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,498$1,253 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,070$1,483 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.4102.42023
Homeownership rate76.9%64.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate8.6%8.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1%−1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher16.2% — more favorable12.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate17.3% ±5%21.8% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3,21830812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.514.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+5.1% — more favorable−38.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high98°F98°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low31°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation6.8"6.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute32.9 min24.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age31.328.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools682024-25 school year
Students per teacher20.419.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency17.5%24.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency36.5%37.5% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility80.0%87.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Rosamond

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, heat wave, earthquake.

Shafter

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, heat wave, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Rosamond
—
Rosamond: Your Score
41
Area Score
Shafter
—
Shafter: Your Score
45
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Rosamond, CA · Shafter, CA · How this is calculated: methodology