Rogers vs Taylors

Which is the better fit for you?

Rogers, AR
77
Area Score
Top 2% nationally
Taylors, SC
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rogers receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Rogers to Taylors

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% higher
Regional price level 93.1 against 91.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$8 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,339 in Taylors against $1,347 in Rogers.
The median home
16% less
$257,500 in Taylors against $308,200 in Rogers.
The weather you would swap
Winters 8°F milder
Normal January lows are 35°F in Taylors against 27°F in Rogers; July highs are 91°F against 90°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

29 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Rogers
Taylors
Opportunity: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
88 · Top 1%
vs
85 · Top 3%
Growth: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
78 · Top 6%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
73 · Top 38%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
58 · Top 50%
vs
64 · Top 44%
Housing affordability: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
87 · Top 4%
vs
78 · Top 17%
Schools: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
75 · Top 19%
vs
79 · Top 12%
Access: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
97 · Top 24%
Economic stability: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
57 · Bottom 47%

Measured values

MetricRogersTaylorsSource period
Population72,98124,5052024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$86,728 ±$4,087$77,144 ±$12,4762024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$44,802 — more favorable$36,9972024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,876/sq mi2,320/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$308,200$257,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,270 ±$51$1,337 ±$1092024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,347$1,339 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index91.5 — more favorable93.12023
Homeownership rate57.2%74.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.1% — more favorable3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+3.4%+4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.4%46.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.3% ±2%10.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)7214,87312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents9.9 — more favorable8.912 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+19.6% — more favorable−10.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low27°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.4"47.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi — more favorable11 miNASR current cycle
Average commute19.5 min — more favorable23.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.337.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3092024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.6 — more favorable16.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.8%64.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency54.2%69.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Arkansas and South Carolina do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Rogers

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, cold wave.

Taylors

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Rogers
—
Rogers: Your Score
77
Area Score
Taylors
—
Taylors: Your Score
75
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Rogers, AR · Taylors, SC · How this is calculated: methodology