Rogers vs Siloam Springs

Which is the better fit for you?

Rogers, AR
77
Area Score
Top 2% nationally
Siloam Springs, AR
72
Area Score
Top 10% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rogers receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Rogers to Siloam Springs

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 91.5 against 91.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,347 in Siloam Springs against $1,347 in Rogers.
The median home
28% less
$221,700 in Siloam Springs against $308,200 in Rogers.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 27°F in Siloam Springs against 27°F in Rogers; July highs are 90°F against 90°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Rogers
Siloam Springs
Opportunity: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
88 · Top 1%
vs
80 · Top 8%
Growth: Siloam Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
78 · Top 6%
vs
89 · Top 1%
Climate
73 · Top 38%
vs
73 · Top 38%
Physical resilience: Siloam Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
58 · Top 50%
vs
59 · Top 49%
Housing affordability: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
87 · Top 4%
vs
81 · Top 11%
Schools: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
75 · Top 19%
vs
48 · Bottom 47%
Access: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
96 · Top 36%
Economic stability: Rogers is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
46 · Bottom 29%

Measured values

MetricRogersSiloam SpringsSource period
Population72,98118,6992024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$86,728 — more favorable$72,0652024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$44,802 — more favorable$29,3272024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,876/sq mi1,522/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$308,200$221,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,270$1,003 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,347$1,347FY2026
Cost of living index91.591.52023
Homeownership rate57.2%59.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.1% — more favorable3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+3.4%+3.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.4% — more favorable27.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.3% ±2%12.6% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)72136712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents9.919.6 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+19.6%+58.9% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low27°F27°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.4"45.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi — more favorable14 miNASR current cycle
Average commute19.5 min — more favorable24.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.332.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3062024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.6 — more favorable15.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency53.8% — more favorable49.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency54.2% — more favorable41.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility46.4%60.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Rogers

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, cold wave.

Siloam Springs

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, cold wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Rogers
—
Rogers: Your Score
77
Area Score
Siloam Springs
—
Siloam Springs: Your Score
72
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Rogers, AR · Siloam Springs, AR · How this is calculated: methodology