Redwood City vs San Francisco

Which is the better fit for you?

Redwood City, CA
57
Area Score
Bottom 45% nationally
San Francisco, CA
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Redwood City receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Redwood City to San Francisco

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 117.6 against 117.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $3,604 in San Francisco against $3,604 in Redwood City.
The median home
23% less
$1,394,500 in San Francisco against $1,801,700 in Redwood City.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 47°F in San Francisco against 45°F in Redwood City; July highs are 66°F against 73°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Redwood City
San Francisco
Opportunity: Redwood City is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
61 · Top 40%
vs
59 · Top 43%
Growth: Redwood City is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
56 · Top 37%
vs
37 · Bottom 24%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
37 · Bottom 30%
vs
45 · Bottom 36%
Housing affordability: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
32 · Bottom 4%
vs
48 · Bottom 19%
Schools: Redwood City is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
54 · Top 44%
vs
51 · Top 48%
Access: Redwood City is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 17%
vs
81 · Bottom 23%
Economic stability: Redwood City is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 33%
vs
56 · Bottom 46%

Measured values

MetricRedwood CitySan FranciscoSource period
Population82,447830,2352024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$157,814 — more favorable$140,9702024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$84,106$92,289 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,264/sq mi17,784/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,801,700$1,394,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,968$2,476 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,604$3,604FY2026
Cost of living index117.6117.62023
Homeownership rate48.6%38.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8% — more favorable3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.7%−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher54.4%60.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.0% — more favorable10.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2801,62212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.4 — more favorable2.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+305.8%+27.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high73°F66°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F47°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.6"22.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi — more favorable37 miNASR current cycle
Average commute26.4 min — more favorable33.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.540.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools151282024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.2 — more favorable21.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.9% — more favorable46.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency56.5% — more favorable55.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility54.1%54.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Redwood City

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

San Francisco

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Redwood City
—
Redwood City: Your Score
57
Area Score
San Francisco
—
San Francisco: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Redwood City, CA · San Francisco, CA · How this is calculated: methodology