Reading vs Ashburn

Which is the better fit for you?

Reading, MA
71
Area Score
Top 12% nationally
Ashburn, VA
72
Area Score
Top 10% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Ashburn receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Reading to Ashburn

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
1% lower
Regional price level 109.5 against 110.4 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
14% less
$699,300 in Ashburn against $809,000 in Reading.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F milder
Normal January lows are 25°F in Ashburn against 20°F in Reading; July highs are 88°F against 82°F (summers 6°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

37 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Reading
Ashburn
Opportunity: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
63 · Top 35%
vs
62 · Top 39%
Growth: Ashburn is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
44 · Bottom 36%
vs
45 · Bottom 39%
Climate: Ashburn is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 27%
vs
74 · Top 31%
Physical resilience: Ashburn is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
88 · Top 14%
vs
90 · Top 11%
Housing affordability: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 44%
vs
66 · Bottom 48%
Schools: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
83 · Top 8%
vs
80 · Top 11%
Access: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 23%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
82 · Top 3%
vs
79 · Top 6%

Measured values

MetricReadingAshburnSource period
Population25,61246,0262024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$165,912 ±$12,806$154,978 ±$7,4422024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$74,991 ±$4,132$70,185 ±$3,1832024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,567/sq mi3,009/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$809,000$699,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,991 — more favorable$2,4552024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index110.4109.5 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate82.4%68.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%3.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.6% — more favorable−2.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate66.3% ±3%66.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate3.1% ±1%4.0% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,7081,87612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.74.3 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+10.5% — more favorable−16.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F88°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation44.9"43.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi6 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute34.0 min30.1 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.741.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools9122024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.0 — more favorable12.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency67.1%87.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency68.5%86.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Massachusetts and Virginia do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Reading

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Ashburn

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Reading
—
Reading: Your Score
71
Area Score
Ashburn
—
Ashburn: Your Score
72
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Reading, MA · Ashburn, VA · How this is calculated: methodology