Rancho Cucamonga vs Riverside

Which is the better fit for you?

Rancho Cucamonga, CA
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally
Riverside, CA
46
Area Score
Bottom 10% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rancho Cucamonga receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Rancho Cucamonga to Riverside

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 107.3 against 107.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,201 in Riverside against $2,201 in Rancho Cucamonga.
The median home
21% less
$584,800 in Riverside against $740,200 in Rancho Cucamonga.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 44°F in Riverside against 45°F in Rancho Cucamonga; July highs are 93°F against 94°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Rancho Cucamonga
Riverside
Opportunity: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
56 · Top 49%
vs
45 · Bottom 27%
Growth: Riverside is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
32 · Bottom 17%
vs
57 · Top 36%
Climate: Riverside is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
89 · Top 5%
vs
90 · Top 5%
Physical resilience: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
7 · Bottom 2%
vs
4 · Bottom 1%
Housing affordability: Riverside is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
40 · Bottom 10%
vs
42 · Bottom 12%
Schools: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
65 · Top 30%
vs
27 · Bottom 21%
Access
100 · Top 1%
vs
100 · Top 1%
Economic stability: Rancho Cucamonga is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
61 · Top 43%
vs
54 · Bottom 43%

Measured values

MetricRancho CucamongaRiversideSource period
Population175,411319,0692024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$111,895 — more favorable$91,0452024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$47,475 — more favorable$34,8962024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,771/sq mi3,932/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$740,200$584,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,357$1,914 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,201$2,201FY2026
Cost of living index107.3107.32023
Homeownership rate62.3%56.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.5% — more favorable5.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher37.5% — more favorable25.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate7.8% — more favorable11.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)29259612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.71.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−64.9%+105.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F93°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F44°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation11.6"9.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable9 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate34.5 min ±0.7 min33.8 min ±0.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.633.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools36762024-25 school year
Students per teacher24.322.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency54.3% — more favorable32.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.2% — more favorable49.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility47.5%77.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Rancho Cucamonga

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, earthquake, inland flooding.

Riverside

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, inland flooding, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Rancho Cucamonga
—
Rancho Cucamonga: Your Score
51
Area Score
Riverside
—
Riverside: Your Score
46
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Rancho Cucamonga, CA · Riverside, CA · How this is calculated: methodology